Monitor Communications For Attacks
Monitor organizational systems, including inbound and outbound communications traffic, to detect attacks and indicators of potential attacks.
What an assessor scores, the objectives
SI.L2-3.14.6 is met only when every one of these 3 objectives, from NIST SP 800-171A, is satisfied. A single missed objective makes the whole requirement not met.
- a.the system is monitored to detect attacks and indicators of potential attacks
- b.inbound communications traffic is monitored to detect attacks and indicators of potential attacks
- c.outbound communications traffic is monitored to detect attacks and indicators of potential attacks
How a C3PAO checks it
NIST SP 800-171A defines three assessment methods. For SI.L2-3.14.6, an assessor uses these:
System and information integrity policy; pr ocedures addressing system monitoring tools and techniques; continuous monitoring strategy; system and information integrity policy; procedures addressing system monitoring tools and techniques; facility diagram or layout; system security plan; system monitoring tools and techniques documentation; system design documentation; locations within system where monitoring devices are deployed; system protocols; system configuration settings and associated documentation; system audit logs and records; other relevant documents or records
System or network administrators; personnel with information security responsibilities; personnel installing, configuring, and maintaining the system; personnel with responsibility monitoring the system; personnel with responsibility for the intrusion detection system
Organizational processes for system monitoring; mechanisms supporting or implementing intrusion detection capability and system monitoring; mechanisms supporting or implementing system monitoring capability; organizational processes for intrusion detection and system monitoring; mechanisms supporting or implementing the monitoring of inbound and outbound communications traffic
What it means, in context
System monitoring includes external and internal monitoring. External monitoring includes the observation of events occurring at the system boundary (i.e., part of perimeter defense and boundary protection). Internal monitoring includes the observation of events occurring within the system. Organizations can monitor systems, for example, by observing audit record activities in real time or by observing other system aspects such as access patterns, characteristics of access, and other actions. The monitoring objectives may guide determination of the events. System monitoring capability is achieved through a variety of tools and techniques (e.g., intrusion detection systems, intrusion prevention systems, malicious code protection software, scanning tools, audit record monitoring software, network monitoring software). Strategic locations for monitoring devices include selected perimeter locations and near server farms supporting critical applications, with such devices being employed at managed system interfaces. The granularity of monitoring information collected is based on organizational monitoring objectives and the capability of systems to support such objectives. System monitoring is an integral part of continuous monitoring and incident response programs. Output from system monitoring serves as input to continuous monitoring and incident response programs. A network connection is any connection with a device that communicates through a network (e.g., local area network, Internet). A remote connec tion is any connection with a device communicating through an external network (e.g., the Internet). Local, network, and remote connections can be either wired or wireless. Unusual or unauthorized activities or conditions related to inbound/outbound communications traffic include internal traffic that indicates the presence of malicious code in systems or propagating among system components, the unauthorized exporting of information, or signaling to external systems. Evidence of malicious code is used to id entify potentially compromised systems or system components. System monitoring requirements, including the need for specific types of system monitoring, may be referenced in other requirements. NIST SP 800-94 provides guidance on intrusion detection and prevention systems.
Think of indicators of attack as a set of footprints an adversary leaves during an attack. Indicators of attack provide information on the steps the adversary followed and its intent. Indicators of attacks on organizational systems may include: • internal traffic that indicates the presence of malicious code; • anomalous activity detected during non-business hours; • unauthorized data leaving the organization; and • communicating to external information systems. To detect attacks and indicators of attacks, deploy monitoring devices or agents. Place these sensors at strategic points within the systems and networks to collect essential information. Strategic points include internal and external system boundaries. Monitor both inbou nd traffic and outbound traffic as well as actions on hosts. This requirement, SI.L2-3.14.6, provides details for the communications of organizational systems. SI.L2-3.14.6 supports the requirement AU.L2-3.3.1, which involves creating and retaining records for monitoring, analysis, and investigations. Example It is your job to look for known indicators of attack or anomalous activity within your systems and communications traffic [a,b,c]. Because these indicators can show up in a variety of places on your network, you have created a checklist of places to check each week. These include the office firewall logs, the audit logs of the file server where CUI is stored, and the connection log for your VPN gateway [b]. You conduct additional reviews when you find an indicator, or something that does not perform as it should [a]. Potential Assessment Considerations • Are details provided for the methodology of determining attacks and indicators of attack [a]? • Are monitoring devices deployed within the information system to collect information that may indicate an attack [a]? • Are communications traffic flows understood and is there a deployed capability to review that traffic [b,c]?
What passing evidence looks like
Watching traffic and the system for attack signs, inbound and outbound: the monitoring surfaces you actually use (Defender alerts, firewall logs, sign in risk) named, with a recent review instance.
Common ways contractors fail SI.L2-3.14.6
- !Five points across monitor organizational systems AND inbound AND outbound traffic. The answer stack: Defender EDR alerts, the firewall's traffic logging, and the monthly review record tie all three verbs together.
The step by step walkthrough for Microsoft 365 GCC High, Google Workspace, and on premises setups, plus the exact evidence to capture, lives inside the Level 2 Accelerator.
Prove SI.L2-3.14.6, and the other 109
The Level 2 Accelerator walks all 110 requirements with you, generates your SSP, POA&M, and Audit Room from real evidence, includes the full Level 1 platform, and puts a credentialed officer alongside you for 180 days. Filed in 180 days, or we work free until you are.
No credit card. Phase 2 begins Nov 10, 2026, when applicable DoD solicitations start requiring a current Level 2 status to win the award.
SI.L2-3.14.6 questions, answered
How many points is CMMC requirement SI.L2-3.14.6 worth?+
SI.L2-3.14.6 is worth 5 points in the CMMC Level 2 score under 32 CFR 170.24. If it is not met, you lose 5 from your total of 110.
Can SI.L2-3.14.6 be placed on a POA&M?+
No. SI.L2-3.14.6 must be fully met before you can file. It cannot be deferred to a POA&M, so it is a gate on your assessment.
What family does SI.L2-3.14.6 belong to?+
SI.L2-3.14.6 is in the System & Information Integrity (SI) family, one of the 14 families of NIST SP 800-171 that make up CMMC Level 2.
- NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2 3.14.6