SI.L2-3.14.4 · NIST SP 800-171 3.14.4

Update Malicious Code Protection

Update malicious code protection mechanisms when new releases are available.

5 points if not metMust be fully met, cannot POA&M1 assessment objective

What an assessor scores, the objectives

SI.L2-3.14.4 is met only when every one of these 1 objectives, from NIST SP 800-171A, is satisfied. A single missed objective makes the whole requirement not met.

  • a.malicious code protection mechanisms are updated when new releases are available

How a C3PAO checks it

NIST SP 800-171A defines three assessment methods. For SI.L2-3.14.4, an assessor uses these:

Examine

System and information integrity policy; configuration management policy and procedures; procedures addressing malicious code protection; malicious code protection mechanisms; records of malicious code protection updates; system security plan; system design documentation; system configuration settings and associated documentation; scan results from malicious code protection mechanisms; record of actions initiated by malicious code protection mechanisms in response to malicious code detection; system audit logs and records; other relevant documents or records

Interview

System or network administrators; personnel with information security responsibilities; personnel installing, configuring, and maintaining the system; personnel with responsibility for malicious code protection; personnel with configuration management responsibility

Test

Organizational processes for employing, updating, and configuring malicious code protection mechanisms; organizational process for addressing false positives and resulting potential impact; mechanisms supporting or implementing malicious code protection mechanisms (including updates and configurations); mechanisms supporting or implementing malicious code scanning and subsequent actions

What it means, in context

Malicious code protection mechanisms include anti- virus signature definitions and reputation-based technologies . A variety of technologies and methods exist to limit or eliminate the effects of malicious code. Pervasive configuration management and comprehensive software integrity controls may be effective in preventing execution of unauthorized code. In addition to commercial off-the-shelf software, malicious code may also be present in custom -built software. This could include logic bombs, back doors, and other types of cyber -attacks that could affect organizational missions/business functions . Traditional malicious code protection mechanisms cannot always detect such code. In these situations, organizations rely instead on other safeguards including secure coding practices, configuration management and control, trusted procurement processes, and monitoring technologies to help ensure that software does not perform functions other than the functions intended.

Malware changes on an hourly or daily basis, and it is important to update detection and protection mechanisms frequently to maintain the effectiveness of the protection. Example You have installed anti- malware software to protect a computer from malicious code. Knowing that malware evolves rapidly, you configure the software to automatically check for malware definition updates every day and update as needed [a]. Potential Assessment Considerations • Is there a defined frequency by which malicious code protection mechanisms must be updated (e.g., frequency of automatic updates or manual processes) [a]?

What passing evidence looks like

Malware protection updating itself: the definitions current timestamp from the console, with automatic updates on.

Common ways contractors fail SI.L2-3.14.4

  • !The evidence is a timestamp: definitions updated today or yesterday across the fleet. A machine showing definitions from last month is the finding walking.

The step by step walkthrough for Microsoft 365 GCC High, Google Workspace, and on premises setups, plus the exact evidence to capture, lives inside the Level 2 Accelerator.

Prove SI.L2-3.14.4, and the other 109

The Level 2 Accelerator walks all 110 requirements with you, generates your SSP, POA&M, and Audit Room from real evidence, includes the full Level 1 platform, and puts a credentialed officer alongside you for 180 days. Filed in 180 days, or we work free until you are.

No credit card. Phase 2 begins Nov 10, 2026, when applicable DoD solicitations start requiring a current Level 2 status to win the award.

SI.L2-3.14.4 questions, answered

How many points is CMMC requirement SI.L2-3.14.4 worth?+

SI.L2-3.14.4 is worth 5 points in the CMMC Level 2 score under 32 CFR 170.24. If it is not met, you lose 5 from your total of 110.

Can SI.L2-3.14.4 be placed on a POA&M?+

No. SI.L2-3.14.4 must be fully met before you can file. It cannot be deferred to a POA&M, so it is a gate on your assessment.

What family does SI.L2-3.14.4 belong to?+

SI.L2-3.14.4 is in the System & Information Integrity (SI) family, one of the 14 families of NIST SP 800-171 that make up CMMC Level 2.

Key references
  • NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2 3.14.4
  • FAR Clause 52.204-21 b.1.xiv