Split Tunneling
Prevent remote devices from simultaneously establishing non- remote connections with organizational systems and communicating via some other connection to resources in external networks (i.e., split tunneling).
What an assessor scores, the objectives
SC.L2-3.13.7 is met only when every one of these 1 objectives, from NIST SP 800-171A, is satisfied. A single missed objective makes the whole requirement not met.
- a.remote devices are prevented from simultaneously establishing non-remote connections with the system and communicating via some other connection to resources in external networks (i.e., split tunneling)
How a C3PAO checks it
NIST SP 800-171A defines three assessment methods. For SC.L2-3.13.7, an assessor uses these:
System and communications protection policy; procedures addressing boundary protection; system security plan; system design documentation; system hardware and software; system architecture; system configuration settings and associated documentation; system audit logs and records; other relevant documents or records
System or network administrators; personnel with information security responsibilities; system developer; personnel with boundary protection responsibilities
Mechanisms implementing boundary protection capability; m echanisms supporting or restricting non-remote connections
What it means, in context
Split tunneling might be desirable by remote users to communicate with local system resources such as printers or file servers . However, split tunneling allo ws unauthorized external connections, making the system more vulnerable to attack and to exfiltration of organizational information. This requirement is implemented in remote devices (e.g., notebook computers, smart phones, and tablets) through configuration settings to disable split tunneling in those devices, and by preventing configuration settings from being readily configurable by users . This requirement is implemented in the system by the detection of split tunneling (or of configuration settings that allow split tunneling) in the remote device, and by prohibiting the connection if the remote device is using split tunneling.
Split tunneling for a remote user utilizes two connections: accessing resources on the internal network via a VPN and simultaneously accessing an external network such as a public network or the internet. Split tunneling presents a potential opportunity where an open unencrypted connection from a public network could allow an adversary to access resources on internal network. As a mitigation strategy, the split tunneling setting should be disabled on all devices so that all traffic, including traffic for external networks or the internet, goes through the VPN. Example You are a system administrator responsible for configuring the network to prevent remote users from using split tunneling . You review the configuration of remote user laptops . You discover that remote users are able to access files, email, database and other services through the VPN connection while also being able to print and access resources on their local network. You change the configuration setting s for all company computers to disable split tunneling [a]. You test a laptop that has had the new hardening procedures applied and verify that all traffic from the laptop is now routed through the VPN connection. Potential Assessment Considerations • Does the system prevent remote devices that have established connections (e.g., remote laptops) with the system from communicating outside that communications path with resources on uncontrolled/unauthorized networks [a]?
What passing evidence looks like
Split tunneling prevented on remote clients: the VPN client configuration forcing full tunnel, or the documented cloud only posture where no VPN exists.
Common ways contractors fail SC.L2-3.13.7
- !Only applies where remote devices tunnel into your network. Cloud only shops with no VPN can document exactly that; if a VPN exists, show the full tunnel or split tunnel disabled setting.
The step by step walkthrough for Microsoft 365 GCC High, Google Workspace, and on premises setups, plus the exact evidence to capture, lives inside the Level 2 Accelerator.
Prove SC.L2-3.13.7, and the other 109
The Level 2 Accelerator walks all 110 requirements with you, generates your SSP, POA&M, and Audit Room from real evidence, includes the full Level 1 platform, and puts a credentialed officer alongside you for 180 days. Filed in 180 days, or we work free until you are.
No credit card. Phase 2 begins Nov 10, 2026, when applicable DoD solicitations start requiring a current Level 2 status to win the award.
SC.L2-3.13.7 questions, answered
How many points is CMMC requirement SC.L2-3.13.7 worth?+
SC.L2-3.13.7 is worth 1 point in the CMMC Level 2 score under 32 CFR 170.24. If it is not met, you lose 1 from your total of 110.
Can SC.L2-3.13.7 be placed on a POA&M?+
Yes. A gap on SC.L2-3.13.7 can be deferred to a Plan of Action and Milestones, provided your overall score is 88 or better and the item closes within 180 days.
What family does SC.L2-3.13.7 belong to?+
SC.L2-3.13.7 is in the System & Communications Protection (SC) family, one of the 14 families of NIST SP 800-171 that make up CMMC Level 2.
- NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2 3.13.7