Audit Failure Alerting

What it means, in context

Audit logging process failures include software and hardware errors, failures in the audit record capturing mechanisms, and audit record storage capacity being reached or exceeded. This requirement applies to each audit record data storage repository (i.e., distinct system component where audit records are stored), the total audit record storage capacity of organizations (i.e., all audit record data storage repositories combined), or both.

Audit logging keeps track of activities occurring on the network, servers, user workstations, and other components of the overall system . These logs must always be available and functional. The company’s designated security personnel (e.g. , system administrator and security officer) need to be aware when the audit log process fails or becomes unavailable [a]. N otifications (e.g., email, Short Message Service (SMS)) should to be sent to the company’s designated security personnel to immediately take appropriate action. If security personnel are unaware of the audit logging process failure, then they will be unaware of any suspicious activity occurring at that time. Response to an audit logging process failure should account for the extent of the failure (e.g., a single component’s audit logging versus failure of the centralized logging solution), the risks involved in this loss of audit logging, and other factors (e.g., the possibility that an adversary could have caused the audit logging process failure). Example You are in charge of IT operations for a company that processes CUI , and y our responsibilities include managing the audit logging process . You configure your systems to send you an email in the event of an audit log failure. One day, you receive one of these alerts. You connect to the system, restart logging, and determine why the logging stopped [a,b,c]. Potential Assessment Considerations • Will the system alert personnel with security responsibilities in the event of an audit processing failure?